Hopkins v. Zipp Sporting Goods, Inc.

330 So. 2d 190, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14964
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 20, 1976·No. No. 75-1104·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Whetzel v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Fla.App.1972, 266 So.2d 89, which holds that a question of law is presented under the facts of this case. In our judgment, the question of law was correctly determined by the trial judge upon the basis of the law as stated in Manis v. Miller, Fla.App.1976, 327 So. 2d 117.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hopkins v. Zipp Sporting Goods, Inc., 330 So. 2d 190, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14964 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

330 So. 2d 190 (Hopkins v. Zipp Sporting Goods, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nitram, Inc. v. Industrial Risk Insurers
154 F.R.D. 274 (M.D. Florida, 1994)
Chandler v. Chandler
330 So. 2d 190 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)