Hopkins v. Tinklepaugh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hopkins v. Tinklepaugh

234 A.D. 728

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1931

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 234 A.D. 728 (Hopkins v. Tinklepaugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hopkins v. Tinklepaugh, 234 A.D. 728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crouch and Thompson, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts upon the ground that findings of fact numbered 25, 26 and 31 are against the weight of the evidence and that under all the circumstances existing at the time of the transfer, including probable foreclosure, with resultant costs and deficiency judgment, a fair equivalent was given. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgeomb and Thompson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crouch and Thompson, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts upon the ground that findings of fact numbered 25, 26 and 31 are against the weight of the evidence and that under all the circumstances existing at the time of the transfer, including probable foreclosure, with resultant costs and deficiency judgment, a fair equivalent was given. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgeomb and Thompson, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D. 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopkins-v-tinklepaugh-nyappdiv-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack