Hopkins v. Tinklepaugh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hopkins v. Tinklepaugh

234 A.D. 728

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1931·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crouch and Thompson, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts upon the ground that findings of fact numbered 25, 26 and 31 are against the weight of the evidence and that under all the circumstances existing at the time of the transfer, including probable foreclosure, with resultant costs and deficiency judgment, a fair equivalent was given. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgeomb and Thompson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crouch and Thompson, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts upon the ground that findings of fact numbered 25, 26 and 31 are against the weight of the evidence and that under all the circumstances existing at the time of the transfer, including probable foreclosure, with resultant costs and deficiency judgment, a fair equivalent was given. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgeomb and Thompson, JJ.

Hopkins v. Tinklepaugh, 234 A.D. 728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

234 A.D. 728 (Hopkins v. Tinklepaugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related