Hopkins v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Hopkins v. State

DecidedApril 8, 2004

Docket2004-MO-014

StatusUnpublished

This text of Hopkins v. State (Hopkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hopkins v. State, (S.C. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Moultrie v. State

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court

Anthony Hopkins, Petitioner,

v.

State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appeal from Richland County
J. Ernest Kinard, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Memorandum Opinion No. 2004-MO-014
Submitted March 17, 2004 - Filed April 8, 2004

DISMISSED

Robert M. Pachak, of South Carolina Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for petitioner.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General B. Allen Bullard, and Assistant Attorney General David Spencer, all of Columbia, for respondent.

PER CURIAM: After careful consideration, we dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. See Wolfe v. State, 326 S.C. 158, 485 S.E.2d 367 (1997) (defendant who pleads guilty on advice of counsel must show counsel was ineffective).

TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, BURNETT and PLEICONES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI