Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hopkins v. State

Hopkins v. State

884 So. 2d 1073, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15123, 2004 WL 2309033
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 15, 2004
DocketNo. 5D04-3084
StatusPublished

This text of 884 So. 2d 1073 (Hopkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hopkins v. State, 884 So. 2d 1073, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15123, 2004 WL 2309033 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Clifford Hopkins appeals the order of the trial court summarily denying his Rule 3.850 motion. We affirm for two reasons. First, his Rule 8.850 motion concerning his criminal case that became final in 1996, is untimely. Second, his motion is successive. This court addressed the same essential issue raised here in its opinion growing out of an appeal from an order denying an earlier Rule 3.850 motion. See Hopkins v. State, 743 So.2d 171 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, C.J., MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hopkins v. State
743 So. 2d 171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
884 So. 2d 1073, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15123, 2004 WL 2309033, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopkins-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.