Hopkins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hopkins v. State

697 So. 2d 1009, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9294, 1997 WL 461150

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 13, 1997

DocketNo. 96-0775

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 697 So. 2d 1009 (Hopkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hopkins v. State, 697 So. 2d 1009, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9294, 1997 WL 461150 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the conviction in all respects but remand to correct sentencing errors. The sentencing orders erroneously reflect that defendant pleaded guilty when, actually, he was convicted after a jury trial. We also agree with defendant that the assessment of victim costs was not orally pronounced in the open court and is stricken. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111, 112 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (trial court must give defendant notice of discretionary costs being imposed at sentencing in a manner sufficient for the defendant to know the legal basis for the costs imposed and an opportunity to object to the imposition of those costs).

[1010]*1010CONVICTION AFFIRMED; REMANDED TO CORRECT SENTENCING ERRORS.

WARNER, FARMER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the conviction in all respects but remand to correct sentencing errors. The sentencing orders erroneously reflect that defendant pleaded guilty when, actually, he was convicted after a jury trial. We also agree with defendant that the assessment of victim costs was not orally pronounced in the open court and is stricken. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111, 112 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (trial court must give defendant notice of discretionary costs being imposed at sentencing in a manner sufficient for the defendant to know the legal basis for the costs imposed and an opportunity to object to the imposition of those costs).

[1010]*1010CONVICTION AFFIRMED; REMANDED TO CORRECT SENTENCING ERRORS.

WARNER, FARMER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

697 So. 2d 1009, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9294, 1997 WL 461150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopkins-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack