Hopkins v. Southern Railway Co.

226 N.C. 655
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 30, 1946
StatusPublished

This text of 226 N.C. 655 (Hopkins v. Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hopkins v. Southern Railway Co., 226 N.C. 655 (N.C. 1946).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A careful consideration of the evidence offered by plaintiff fails to show any causal relation between the acts of negligence alleged and the injury sustained. No new principle of law is involved. Old and well established principles of law support the action of the court in sustaining demurrer to the evidence.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 N.C. 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopkins-v-southern-railway-co-nc-1946.