Hopkins v. Scofield
858 So. 2d 1272, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17573, 2003 WL 22715088
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Klette v. Klette, 785 So.2d 562 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (“Appellant’s failure to provide either a transcript or a proper substitute, such as a stipulated statement of facts, defeats the appellate court’s ability to review either the factual or legal basis for the trial court’s decision”); see also Lewis v. Lewis, 807 So.2d [1273]*1273777 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Green v. Green, 788 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hopkins v. Scofield, 858 So. 2d 1272, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17573, 2003 WL 22715088 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
858 So. 2d 1272 (Hopkins v. Scofield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Klette v. Klette
785 So. 2d 562 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Green v. Green
788 So. 2d 1083 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Lewis v. Lewis
807 So. 2d 777 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)