Hopkins v. Scofield

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hopkins v. Scofield

858 So. 2d 1272, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17573, 2003 WL 22715088

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 19, 2003

DocketNo. 1D03-2178

StatusPublished

This text of 858 So. 2d 1272 (Hopkins v. Scofield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hopkins v. Scofield, 858 So. 2d 1272, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17573, 2003 WL 22715088 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Klette v. Klette, 785 So.2d 562 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (“Appellant’s failure to provide either a transcript or a proper substitute, such as a stipulated statement of facts, defeats the appellate court’s ability to review either the factual or legal basis for the trial court’s decision”); see also Lewis v. Lewis, 807 So.2d [1273]*1273777 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Green v. Green, 788 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

KAHN, WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Klette v. Klette, 785 So.2d 562 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (“Appellant’s failure to provide either a transcript or a proper substitute, such as a stipulated statement of facts, defeats the appellate court’s ability to review either the factual or legal basis for the trial court’s decision”); see also Lewis v. Lewis, 807 So.2d [1273]*1273777 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Green v. Green, 788 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

KAHN, WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

858 So. 2d 1272, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17573, 2003 WL 22715088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopkins-v-scofield-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack