Hopkins v. Riggs

New York Supreme Court

Hopkins v. Riggs

8 N.Y.S. 713, 5 Silv. Sup. 485, 30 N.Y. St. Rep. 371, 55 Hun 611, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1729

DecidedFebruary 12, 1890

StatusPublished

This text of 8 N.Y.S. 713 (Hopkins v. Riggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hopkins v. Riggs, 8 N.Y.S. 713, 5 Silv. Sup. 485, 30 N.Y. St. Rep. 371, 55 Hun 611, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1729 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Dykman, J.

There is no merit in this appeal. The action is for the recovery of damages for false and fraudulent representations, and depended entirely upon the evidence for its sustenance. The case was fairly submitted to the jury, and a verdict was rendered for the plaintiff. The facts are thus settled against the defendant; and the evidence was sufficient to justify the submission of the case to the jury, and to sustain the verdict. The judgment and ■order denying a new trial should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dykman, J.

There is no merit in this appeal. The action is for the recovery of damages for false and fraudulent representations, and depended entirely upon the evidence for its sustenance. The case was fairly submitted to the jury, and a verdict was rendered for the plaintiff. The facts are thus settled against the defendant; and the evidence was sufficient to justify the submission of the case to the jury, and to sustain the verdict. The judgment and ■order denying a new trial should be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 N.Y.S. 713, 5 Silv. Sup. 485, 30 N.Y. St. Rep. 371, 55 Hun 611, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopkins-v-riggs-nysupct-1890.