Hopkins v. Poulos
This text of 40 A.D.2d 678 (Hopkins v. Poulos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 22, 1971, which denied his motion to preclude plaintiffs from introducing any evidence as to certain alleged injuries. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. In 'our opinion, the bill of particulars sufficiently complied with the demand therefor. Any further inquiry into the nature and extent of the alleged injuries may be more fully explored by the disclosure devices set forth in the CPLR. Munder, Acting P. J., Latham, Gulotta, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 A.D.2d 678, 336 N.Y.S.2d 216, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopkins-v-poulos-nyappdiv-1972.