Hopkins v. Panama Plaza Construction Corp.
This text of 237 So. 2d 8 (Hopkins v. Panama Plaza Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the trial court dismissing with prejudice appellant’s amended complaint is affirmed. Jackson v. Pike (Fla.1956), 87 So.2d 410; Foley v. Hialeah Race Course (Fla.1951), 53 So.2d 771. Having reached the foregoing conclusion, we find it unnecessary to consider or decide appellee’s contention that the trial court erred in denying its motion for summary judgment.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
237 So. 2d 8, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6054, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopkins-v-panama-plaza-construction-corp-fladistctapp-1970.