Hopkins v. Hebard

152 F. 1022, 81 C.C.A. 681, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4369
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMay 17, 1907
DocketNo. 1,651
StatusPublished

This text of 152 F. 1022 (Hopkins v. Hebard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hopkins v. Hebard, 152 F. 1022, 81 C.C.A. 681, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4369 (6th Cir. 1907).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an application for leave to apply to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee for permission to file in that court a bill to review a final decree of that court, which, upon appeal, was affirmed by this court, in a cause styled David W. Belding et al. v. Charles Hebard, 103 Fed. 532, 43 C. C. A. 296. Without deciding any question which may be involved in the application for leave to file such a bill, this court, for reasons satisfactory, now consent that the petitioners may apply directly to said Circuit Court, which court will grant or refuse permission as it may be advised. Board of Councilmen of City of Frankfort v. Deposit Bank, 124 Fed. 18, 59 C. C. A. 538.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Belding v. Hebard
103 F. 532 (Sixth Circuit, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 F. 1022, 81 C.C.A. 681, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopkins-v-hebard-ca6-1907.