Hopkins v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hopkins v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

422 So. 2d 1014, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21692

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 24, 1982

DocketNo. AL-373

StatusPublished

This text of 422 So. 2d 1014 (Hopkins v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hopkins v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 422 So. 2d 1014, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21692 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

JOANOS, Judge.

Appellant contends the Parole and Probation Commission (Commission) erred in assigning his presumptive parole release date (PPRD). We disagree and affirm.

Application of objective parole guidelines to appellant’s 1965 convictions does not violate the ex post facto clause. See Lopez v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 410 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

The Commission properly used the most severe crime to determine the salient factor score, then used the other counts as aggravating factors to determine appellant’s PPRD for the 1965 convictions. Fla.Admin. Code Rule 23-21.10(4)(a)(l)(h).

SHAW and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI