Hopkins v. Division of Employment Security

301 S.W.3d 594, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 86
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 2, 2010·No. WD 70894·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Darrell Hopkins appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (“Commission”) order affirming the dismissal of his claim for unemployment benefits. Hopkins contends that the Commission erred in affirming the order of dismissal because: (1) Hopkins had no opportunity to present his own evidence regarding the validity of his discharge from employment and thus he was denied a fair hearing; and (2) the evidence that his employer presented to support his termination was fabricated and procured by fraud. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hopkins v. Division of Employment Security, 301 S.W.3d 594, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 86 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

301 S.W.3d 594 (Hopkins v. Division of Employment Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related