Hopkins v. Coburn

New York Supreme Court

Hopkins v. Coburn

1 Wend. 292

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1828

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 1 Wend. 292 (Hopkins v. Coburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hopkins v. Coburn, 1 Wend. 292 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

The defendant, as a suitor, was undoubtedly privieged from arrest: but here was not an arrest; for though the capias contained an ac etiam clause, bail was not demanded. Had hail been required, all the relief the party would have been entitled to, would have been to have been discharged on filing common bail. The indorsing of an appearance is equivalent to filing common bail. No more was therefore asked of the defendant, than this court would have required, on application to them, had he been compelled to give bail when the capias was served. This is the uniform practice of this court, (7 Johns. R. 538,) and the only exception is in favor of foreign witnesses attending our courts, in which cases the defendants are discharged absolutely. (2 Johns. R. 294. 3 Cowen, 392.)

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

The defendant, as a suitor, was undoubtedly privieged from arrest: but here was not an arrest; for though the capias contained an ac etiam clause, bail was not demanded. Had hail been required, all the relief the party would have been entitled to, would have been to have been discharged on filing common bail. The indorsing of an appearance is equivalent to filing common bail. No more was therefore asked of the defendant, than this court would have required, on application to them, had he been compelled to give bail when the capias was served. This is the uniform practice of this court, (7 Johns. R. 538,) and the only exception is in favor of foreign witnesses attending our courts, in which cases the defendants are discharged absolutely. (2 Johns. R. 294. 3 Cowen, 392.)

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Wend. 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopkins-v-coburn-nysupct-1828.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack