Hopkins v. Coburn

1 Wend. 292
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1828·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

The defendant, as a suitor, was undoubtedly privieged from arrest: but here was not an arrest; for though the capias contained an ac etiam clause, bail was not demanded. Had hail been required, all the relief the party would have been entitled to, would have been to have been discharged on filing common bail. The indorsing of an appearance is equivalent to filing common bail. No more was therefore asked of the defendant, than this court would have required, on application to them, had he been compelled to give bail when the capias was served. This is the uniform practice of this court, (7 Johns. R. 538,) and the only exception is in favor of foreign witnesses attending our courts, in which cases the defendants are discharged absolutely. (2 Johns. R. 294. 3 Cowen, 392.)

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hopkins v. Coburn, 1 Wend. 292 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).

1 Wend. 292 (Hopkins v. Coburn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Hess v. Flansburg
26 N.Y.S. 329 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)
Christian v. Williams
20 S.W. 96 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1892)
Baldwin v. Emerson
15 A. 83 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1888)
Palmer v. Rowan
21 Neb. 452 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1887)
Massey v. Colville
45 N.J.L. 119 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1883)
Atchison v. Morris
11 F. 582 (N.D. Illinois, 1882)
In re Healey
53 Vt. 694 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1881)
Jones v. Knauss
31 N.J. Eq. 211 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1879)
Person v. . Grier
66 N.Y. 124 (New York Court of Appeals, 1876)
Waterman v. Isaac Merritt & Co.
7 R.I. 345 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1862)
Hardenbrook's Case
8 Abb. Pr. 416 (New York Supreme Court, 1859)
Crocker v. Duncan
6 Blackf. 278 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1842)