Hopkins v. Blum
This text of 448 N.E.2d 798 (Hopkins v. Blum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[1014]*1014Judgment affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (87 AD2d 613) to which we add that, although the notice of denial of benefits was defective for the further reason that it failed to state the regulation supporting the action as required by 45 CFR 205.10 (a) (4) (i) (B), that defect also was waived by petitioner’s counsel’s failure to raise the defect at the hearing.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
448 N.E.2d 798, 58 N.Y.2d 1011, 461 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 2952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopkins-v-blum-ny-1983.