Hopkins, P. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila Cty.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 29, 2015·No. 57 EM 2015·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

PATRICK J. HOPKINS, : No. 57 EM 2015 :

Petitioner :

: :

v. :

: :

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PA, AND : DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PA, :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of June, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process and the Petition for Extraordinary Relief and/or Habeas Corpus Relief are

DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (providing that

hybrid representation is improper). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings

to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hopkins, P. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila Cty., (Pa. 2015).

Hopkins, P. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila Cty. (Hopkins, P. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila Cty.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)