Hopkins, P. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila Cty.
This text of Hopkins, P. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila Cty. (Hopkins, P. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
PATRICK J. HOPKINS, : No. 57 EM 2015 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PA, AND : DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PA, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 29th day of June, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process and the Petition for Extraordinary Relief and/or Habeas Corpus Relief are
DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (providing that
hybrid representation is improper). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings
to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hopkins, P. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila Cty., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopkins-p-v-ct-com-pl-phila-cty-pa-2015.