Hopkins, P. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila Cty.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
PATRICK J. HOPKINS, : No. 57 EM 2015 :
Petitioner :
: :
v. :
: :
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PA, AND : DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PA, :
:
Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 29th day of June, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process and the Petition for Extraordinary Relief and/or Habeas Corpus Relief are
DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (providing that
hybrid representation is improper). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings
to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hopkins, P. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila Cty. (Hopkins, P. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila Cty.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.