Hopkins, P. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila Cty.

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 29, 2015
Docket57 EM 2015
StatusPublished

This text of Hopkins, P. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila Cty. (Hopkins, P. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hopkins, P. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila Cty., (Pa. 2015).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

PATRICK J. HOPKINS, : No. 57 EM 2015 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PA, AND : DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PA, : : Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of June, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process and the Petition for Extraordinary Relief and/or Habeas Corpus Relief are

DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (providing that

hybrid representation is improper). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings

to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hopkins, P. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila Cty., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopkins-p-v-ct-com-pl-phila-cty-pa-2015.