Hopkins, Allen & Co. v. Suddeth

18 Ga. 518
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 15, 1855·No. No. 70·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

Starnes, J.

delivering the opinion.

[1.] We are of opinion that the application for a certiorari in this case, should not have been dismissed, for the reason, that the Court had ordered the same to issue at a previous term, and that (as shown by the record) it was no fault of the-plaintiff in error, that it had not so issued ; the petition having been mislaid by the opposite Counsel, and the issuing of' the writ so prevented.

We incline to think, too, that the original proceeding was not irregular; that the second original attachment was properly issued by the Justice of the Peace in Baker County. We find no positive provision of the law requiring the Clerk. [520]*520to do this, though it is the practice, in some places. It is also> the inclination of our minds, that it was not necessary for a, bond and affidavit to be sent to Lee County. But perhaps-these questions should be left open for consideration, when. the certiorari brings them up; and we leave them free, to be^ discussed at that time, if it should be desired.

Let the judgment be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hopkins, Allen & Co. v. Suddeth, 18 Ga. 518 (Ga. 1855).

18 Ga. 518 (Hopkins, Allen & Co. v. Suddeth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. City of Washington
61 S.E. 923 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Walea v. State
49 S.E. 710 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Cole v. Thurman
45 S.E. 718 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Zachery v. State
32 S.E. 22 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)