Hopgood v. State
This text of 30 S.E.2d 63 (Hopgood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tlie defendant was convicted in the criminal court of Pulton County of the offenses of carrying a concealed weapon and carrying a pistol without a license. His certiorari was overruled in the superior court, and that judgment was assigned as error. The general assignments of error in the petition for certiorari are not argued or insisted upon in the brief of his counsel, and therefore are treated as abandoned. In view of the untraversed and unexcepted-to answer of the trial judge to the petition for certiorari, the special assignments of error show no cause for a new trial; and the overruling of the certiorari was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 S.E.2d 63, 71 Ga. App. 55, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopgood-v-state-gactapp-1944.