Hopgood v. State

417 S.E.2d 149, 262 Ga. 344, 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 1167, 1992 Ga. LEXIS 613
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 25, 1992·No. S92A0158·Published

Opinion

Bell, Justice.

Michael Hopgood appeals from his convictions and sentences for the malice murders and armed robberies of Hak Soo Song and Ae Rim Song.1

The sole enumeration is that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. We find that this enumeration has no merit. Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence showed that on July 3, 1989, appellant entered a store in Atlanta, Georgia, where he shot to death Hak Soo Song and his wife, Ae Rim Song, and robbed them. Extrinsic crimes evidence showed that on June 3, 1989, appellant had gone to a garage in East Point, Georgia, where he used the same pistol to kill and rob the garage owner, William Millirons. We hold that the evidence was sufficient to authorize the jury to find appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the malice murders and the armed robberies of the Songs. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hopgood v. State, 417 S.E.2d 149, 262 Ga. 344, 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 1167, 1992 Ga. LEXIS 613 (Ga. 1992).

417 S.E.2d 149 (Hopgood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. Virginia
443 U.S. 307 (Supreme Court, 1979)