Hopgood v. State
This text of 417 S.E.2d 149 (Hopgood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Michael Hopgood appeals from his convictions and sentences for the malice murders and armed robberies of Hak Soo Song and Ae Rim Song.1
The sole enumeration is that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. We find that this enumeration has no merit. Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence showed that on July 3, 1989, appellant entered a store in Atlanta, Georgia, where he shot to death Hak Soo Song and his wife, Ae Rim Song, and robbed them. Extrinsic crimes evidence showed that on June 3, 1989, appellant had gone to a garage in East Point, Georgia, where he used the same pistol to kill and rob the garage owner, William Millirons. We hold that the evidence was sufficient to authorize the jury to find appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the malice murders and the armed robberies of the Songs. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
417 S.E.2d 149, 262 Ga. 344, 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 1167, 1992 Ga. LEXIS 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopgood-v-state-ga-1992.