Hopgood v. Merrill Lynch

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided September 20, 1994·No. 94-1149·Published

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion


September 19, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

____________________

No. 94-1149

PHILIP D. HOPGOOD, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE, FENNER AND SMITH,

Defendant, Appellee.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Jaime Pieras, Jr., U.S. District Judge]
___________________

____________________

Before

Coffin and Campbell, Senior Circuit Judges,
_____________________

Keeton, Senior District Judge.*
_____________________

____________________

Harold D. Vicente with whom Vicente & Cuebas was on brief for
__________________ _________________
appellants.
Carlos G. Latimer with whom Latimer, Biaggi, Rachid, Rodriguez-
__________________ ____________________________________
Suris & Godreau was on brief for appellees.
_______________

____________________

____________________

____________________

*Of the District of Massachusetts, sitting by designation.

Per Curiam. Substantially for the same reasons set
__________

forth in the opinion of the United States District Court for

the District of Puerto Rico in Hopgood v. Merrill Lynch,
_______ _______________

Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 839 F. Supp. 98 (D.Puerto Rico 1993),
______________________

we affirm. Costs are awarded to the appellee.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hopgood v. Merrill Lynch, (1st Cir. 1994).

Hopgood v. Merrill Lynch (Hopgood v. Merrill Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hopgood v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
839 F. Supp. 98 (D. Puerto Rico, 1993)