Hope v. State

68 So. 3d 366, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13247, 2011 WL 3677080
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 23, 2011·No. 1D10-1867·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the first two issues raised by Appellant without comment, and based on the State’s concession of error on the third issue, we remand for resentencing to reflect the dismissal of the aggravated battery charge.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hope v. State, 68 So. 3d 366, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13247, 2011 WL 3677080 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

68 So. 3d 366 (Hope v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hope v. State
134 So. 3d 1044 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)