Hope v. State

655 So. 2d 1141, 1995 WL 317657
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hope v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 654 So. 2d 639
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 24, 1995·No. No. 94-01139·Published

Opinion

CAMPBELL, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant challenges his judgment and sentence for attempted first degree murder with a firearm. We find merit only in the issue concerning the error in the written judgment entered by the trial court.

Appellant was charged with attempted first degree murder with a firearm. Appellant was found guilty of attempted second degree murder with a firearm. The state concedes that the written judgment erroneously adjudicated appellant guilty of the offense as charged. Thus, this case must be affirmed and remanded so that the sentence conforms to the trial court’s oral pronouncement.

Secondly, appellant contends that the trial court should have instructed the jury on manslaughter pursuant to section 782.11, Florida Statutes (1991), since he alleges he shot the victim only after the victim pushed him. We disagree. In State v. Carrizales, 356 So.2d 274 (Fla.1978), the supreme court stated that a person cannot justify killing another in self-defense unless he has used all reasonable means to avoid the danger and is not entitled to instruction based on section 782.11.

We affirm appellant’s conviction for attempted second degree murder with a fire[1142]*1142arm and remand for the trial court to correct the written judgment to so reflect.

THREADGILL and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hope v. State, 655 So. 2d 1141, 1995 WL 317657 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

655 So. 2d 1141 (Hope v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Carrizales
356 So. 2d 274 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)