Hope v. Emsa Correctional Care

Fourth Circuit

Hope v. Emsa Correctional Care

48 F. App'x 83

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 17, 2002·No. No. 02-6674·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eric Bernard Hope appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hope v. EMSA Correctional Care, No. CA-01-334-3-2-MU (W.D.N.C. filed July 10 & July 11, 2001; entered July 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Eric Bernard Hope appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hope v. EMSA Correctional Care, No. CA-01-334-3-2-MU (W.D.N.C. filed July 10 & July 11, 2001; entered July 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hope v. Emsa Correctional Care, 48 F. App'x 83 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

48 F. App'x 83 (Hope v. Emsa Correctional Care) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related