Hope v. Eastern Transp. Line

12 F. Cas. 486, 1 W.N.C. 394, 1875 U.S. App. LEXIS 1438

Opinion

Motion refused, CADWALADER, District Judge, saying that he took no part in the decision, but considered the first point as exceedingly important.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hope v. Eastern Transp. Line, 12 F. Cas. 486, 1 W.N.C. 394, 1875 U.S. App. LEXIS 1438 (circtedpa 1875).

12 F. Cas. 486 (Hope v. Eastern Transp. Line) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.