Hope v. Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P.C.
174 N.Y.S.3d 642, 208 A.D.3d 1656, 2022 NY Slip Op 05489
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 2022·No. MOTION NO. (378/22) CA 21-01333.·Published
Opinion
Hope v Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P.C. (2022 NY Slip Op 05489)
Decided on September 30, 2022
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, WINSLOW, AND BANNISTER, JJ. (Filed Sept. 30, 2022.)
MOTION NO. (378/22) CA 21-01333.
| Hope v Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P.C. |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 05489 |
| Decided on September 30, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on September 30, 2022
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, WINSLOW, AND BANNISTER, JJ. (Filed Sept. 30, 2022.)
MOTION NO. (378/22) CA 21-01333.
[*1]VALERIE HOPE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
BARTLETT, PONTIFF, STEWART & RHODES, P.C., AND JOHN D. WRIGHT, ESQ., AS PRINCIPAL OF BARTLETT, PONTIFF, STEWART & RHODES, P.C., AS COUNSEL OF BARTLETT, PONTIFF, STEWART & RHODES, P.C., AND INDIVIDUALLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
v
BARTLETT, PONTIFF, STEWART & RHODES, P.C., AND JOHN D. WRIGHT, ESQ., AS PRINCIPAL OF BARTLETT, PONTIFF, STEWART & RHODES, P.C., AS COUNSEL OF BARTLETT, PONTIFF, STEWART & RHODES, P.C., AND INDIVIDUALLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hope v. Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P.C., 174 N.Y.S.3d 642, 208 A.D.3d 1656, 2022 NY Slip Op 05489 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).
174 N.Y.S.3d 642 (Hope v. Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
§ 431
New York JUD § 431