Hope Network-Rehabilitation Services v. City of Kentwood

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 2015·No. 150810·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

July 1, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

150810 Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

HOPE NETWORK — REHABILITATION Richard H. Bernstein, SERVICES, Justices Petitioner-Appellant,

v SC: 150810 COA: 317367 Tax Tribunal: 00-412553

CITY OF KENTWOOD, Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 1, 2015

t0624

Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hope Network-Rehabilitation Services v. City of Kentwood, (Mich. 2015).

Hope Network-Rehabilitation Services v. City of Kentwood (Hope Network-Rehabilitation Services v. City of Kentwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.