Hope Network-Rehabilitation Services v. City of Kentwood
This text of Hope Network-Rehabilitation Services v. City of Kentwood (Hope Network-Rehabilitation Services v. City of Kentwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
July 1, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
150810 Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano HOPE NETWORK — REHABILITATION Richard H. Bernstein, SERVICES, Justices Petitioner-Appellant, v SC: 150810 COA: 317367 Tax Tribunal: 00-412553 CITY OF KENTWOOD, Respondent-Appellee.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. July 1, 2015 t0624 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hope Network-Rehabilitation Services v. City of Kentwood, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hope-network-rehabilitation-services-v-city-of-ken-mich-2015.