Hope Assoc. of Syosset, LLC v. STP Associates, LLC

124 A.D.3d 837, 998 N.Y.S.2d 895
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 28, 2015
Docket2012-08338
StatusPublished

This text of 124 A.D.3d 837 (Hope Assoc. of Syosset, LLC v. STP Associates, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hope Assoc. of Syosset, LLC v. STP Associates, LLC, 124 A.D.3d 837, 998 N.Y.S.2d 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

In an action for declaratory relief, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jaeger, J.), entered July 31, 2012, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff, a home owners association, commenced this action against the defendants, owners of a manufactured home park, alleging that the defendants violated its statutory right of first refusal to huy the subject property. The defendants moved, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint. The Supreme Court granted that branch of the motion.

On a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), the court must accept the facts as alleged in the complaint as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]; DiMauro v United, LLC, 122 AD3d 568 [2014]).

As the Supreme Court correctly concluded, the plaintiff failed to adequately allege that the defendants received a “bona fide *838 offer to purchase” so as to trigger the plaintiffs right of first refusal under Real Property Law § 233-a (Real Property Law § 233-a [3] [a]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint.

Skelos, J.P, Miller, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leon v. Martinez
638 N.E.2d 511 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
DiMauro v. United, LLC
122 A.D.3d 568 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 A.D.3d 837, 998 N.Y.S.2d 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hope-assoc-of-syosset-llc-v-stp-associates-llc-nyappdiv-2015.