Hope Academy Corp. v. LaMothe

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hope Academy Corp. v. LaMothe

457 S.W.3d 394, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 344, 2015 WL 1476781

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 31, 2015·No. WD 77834·Published

Opinion

[395] ORDER

Per curiam:

Hope Academy Corporation appeals from a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission which found that June LaMothe, a former employee, was entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. Hope Academy argues that the Commission’s finding that LaMothe did not engage in misconduct connected with work is not supported by sufficient competent evidence. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[395] ORDER

Per curiam:

Hope Academy Corporation appeals from a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission which found that June LaMothe, a former employee, was entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. Hope Academy argues that the Commission’s finding that LaMothe did not engage in misconduct connected with work is not supported by sufficient competent evidence. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Hope Academy Corp. v. LaMothe, 457 S.W.3d 394, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 344, 2015 WL 1476781 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

457 S.W.3d 394 (Hope Academy Corp. v. LaMothe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.