Hop N Shop Food Stores v. Shore

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hop N Shop Food Stores v. Shore

413 So. 2d 862, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19976

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 12, 1982

DocketNo. AF-245

StatusPublished

This text of 413 So. 2d 862 (Hop N Shop Food Stores v. Shore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hop N Shop Food Stores v. Shore, 413 So. 2d 862, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19976 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

The employer/carrier appeal from a workers’ compensation order awarding the claimant wage loss benefits and rehabilitation benefits. We affirm.

The award of wage loss benefits is supported by competent substantial evidence.

The award of rehabilitation benefits is affirmed on authority of Hurricane Fence Industries v. Bozeman, 413 So.2d 822 (Fla. 1st DCA, opinion released 6 May 1982), Case No. AD-488, and because the Division of Workers’ Compensation did not comply with Section 440.49(1), Florida Statutes (1981).

LARRY G. SMITH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI