Hop N Shop Food Stores v. Shore

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hop N Shop Food Stores v. Shore

413 So. 2d 862, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19976

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 12, 1982·No. No. AF-245·Published

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

The employer/carrier appeal from a workers’ compensation order awarding the claimant wage loss benefits and rehabilitation benefits. We affirm.

The award of wage loss benefits is supported by competent substantial evidence.

The award of rehabilitation benefits is affirmed on authority of Hurricane Fence Industries v. Bozeman, 413 So.2d 822 (Fla. 1st DCA, opinion released 6 May 1982), Case No. AD-488, and because the Division of Workers’ Compensation did not comply with Section 440.49(1), Florida Statutes (1981).

LARRY G. SMITH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MILLS, Judge.

The employer/carrier appeal from a workers’ compensation order awarding the claimant wage loss benefits and rehabilitation benefits. We affirm.

The award of wage loss benefits is supported by competent substantial evidence.

The award of rehabilitation benefits is affirmed on authority of Hurricane Fence Industries v. Bozeman, 413 So.2d 822 (Fla. 1st DCA, opinion released 6 May 1982), Case No. AD-488, and because the Division of Workers’ Compensation did not comply with Section 440.49(1), Florida Statutes (1981).

LARRY G. SMITH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Hop N Shop Food Stores v. Shore, 413 So. 2d 862, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19976 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

413 So. 2d 862 (Hop N Shop Food Stores v. Shore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related