Hoover v. Office of the Public Defender

Fourth Circuit

Hoover v. Office of the Public Defender

131 F. App'x 925

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 18, 2005·No. No. 05-6106·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Leon Hoover seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) without prejudice. We have [926]*926reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Hoover v. Office of the Public Defender, No. CA-04-862 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2005). We also deny Hoover’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Leon Hoover seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) without prejudice. We have [926]*926reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Hoover v. Office of the Public Defender, No. CA-04-862 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2005). We also deny Hoover’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Hoover v. Office of the Public Defender, 131 F. App'x 925 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

131 F. App'x 925 (Hoover v. Office of the Public Defender) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related