Hoover v. North Carolina

Fourth Circuit

Hoover v. North Carolina

615 F. App'x 816

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2015·No. No. 15-6492·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Leon Hoover and Terrence Leroy Wright El appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. North Carolina, No. 5:14-ct-03220-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Leon Hoover and Terrence Leroy Wright El appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. North Carolina, No. 5:14-ct-03220-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Hoover v. North Carolina, 615 F. App'x 816 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

615 F. App'x 816 (Hoover v. North Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related