Hoover v. MICHIGAN MUT. INS. CO.
776 N.W.2d 895, 485 Mich. 1036
Opinion
Rodney HOOVER and Maxine Hoover, Conservators of the Estate of Michael Hoover, a Developmentally Disabled Person, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
MICHIGAN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a/k/a Amerisure, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*896 Order
On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoover v. MICHIGAN MUT. INS. CO., 776 N.W.2d 895, 485 Mich. 1036 (Mich. 2010).
776 N.W.2d 895 (Hoover v. MICHIGAN MUT. INS. CO.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McCORMICK v. CARRIER
795 N.W.2d 517 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2010)
Wilcox v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.
780 N.W.2d 773 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2010)