Hoover v. Hoover

313 So. 2d 364, 1975 La. App. LEXIS 3089
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hoover v. Hoover. Read the opinion of the Court — 313 So. 2d 358
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided May 13, 1975·No. No. 6424·Published

Opinion

SCHOTT, Judge.

Plaintiff originally sued defendant Hoover on the $33,000 note at a time when she was his wife, as discussed in our opinion in Suit No. 6423, 313 So.2d 358, decided by us on this date. Her original suit was dismissed on exception of no right of action and after she obtained a judicial separation from bed and board from defendant she instituted this suit which was then consolidated for trial with the first suit. The judgment in her favor against defendant for the full amount of the note plus interest, attorneys’ fees and court costs, was not appealed from by anyone and is therefore final. Plaintiff is to pay the cost of this appeal.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoover v. Hoover, 313 So. 2d 364, 1975 La. App. LEXIS 3089 (La. Ct. App. 1975).

313 So. 2d 364 (Hoover v. Hoover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoover v. Hoover
313 So. 2d 358 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1975)