Hoover v. Hon. S. Freeman
This text of Hoover v. Hon. S. Freeman (Hoover v. Hon. S. Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
motion filed in petitioner's criminal case. See NRS 34.370 (setting forth the requirements for a petition for a writ of habeas corpus); Sheriff v. Hatch, 100 Nev. 664, 665-66, 691 P.2d 449, 450 (1984) (explaining that a petition for habeas corpus is a collateral attack, which is litigated through an independent action.) Thus, we conclude that this court's intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted, and we deny the petition. See NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. It is so ORDERED.
, C.J.
J.
J. Saitta
cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge Keith Shannon Hoover Attorney General/Carson City Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A e
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hoover v. Hon. S. Freeman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoover-v-hon-s-freeman-nev-2014.