Hoover v. Daniels

Fourth Circuit

Hoover v. Daniels

579 F. App'x 220

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 29, 2014·No. No. 14-6606·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Leon Hoover appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hoover v. Daniels, No. 5:13-ct-03096-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 4 & 16, 2014). We deny Hoover’s motions to appoint counsel and for amendment. We [221] dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Leon Hoover appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hoover v. Daniels, No. 5:13-ct-03096-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 4 & 16, 2014). We deny Hoover’s motions to appoint counsel and for amendment. We [221] dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Hoover v. Daniels, 579 F. App'x 220 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

579 F. App'x 220 (Hoover v. Daniels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related