Hoover v. Bertie Correctional Institute Number 4880

272 F. App'x 238
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 3, 2008·No. No. 07-7742·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Leon Hoover appeals the district court’s order adopting the recom[239]*239mendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hoover v. Bertie Correction Inst, No. 1:07-cv-00615-N CT-WWD (M.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 2007). We deny Hoover’s motion to amend his complaint, deny the motion for appointment of counsel, and deny the motion for a preliminary injunction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoover v. Bertie Correctional Institute Number 4880, 272 F. App'x 238 (4th Cir. 2008).

272 F. App'x 238 (Hoover v. Bertie Correctional Institute Number 4880) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related