Hootman v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Hootman v. State

143 N.E.2d 666, 237 Ind. 698, 1957 Ind. LEXIS 307

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJune 27, 1957

DocketNo. 0-480

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 143 N.E.2d 666 (Hootman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hootman v. State, 143 N.E.2d 666, 237 Ind. 698, 1957 Ind. LEXIS 307 (Ind. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam

This is an original action for an alternative writ of mandamus directed to the Starke Circuit Court. The petition is not prosecuted in the name of the State, nor is the proper party respondent, nor does the petition comply with Rule 2-35 as to certified copies of the pleadings and court records of the [699]*699trial court. See Lester v. Grant Circuit Court (1948), 226 Ind. 186, 78 N. E. 2d 785.

Petition denied.

Note. — Reported in 143 N. E. 2d 666.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

This is an original action for an alternative writ of mandamus directed to the Starke Circuit Court. The petition is not prosecuted in the name of the State, nor is the proper party respondent, nor does the petition comply with Rule 2-35 as to certified copies of the pleadings and court records of the [699]*699trial court. See Lester v. Grant Circuit Court (1948), 226 Ind. 186, 78 N. E. 2d 785.

Petition denied.

Note. — Reported in 143 N. E. 2d 666.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 N.E.2d 666, 237 Ind. 698, 1957 Ind. LEXIS 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hootman-v-state-ind-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack