Hootman v. State
143 N.E.2d 666, 237 Ind. 698, 1957 Ind. LEXIS 307
Opinion
This is an original action for an alternative writ of mandamus directed to the Starke Circuit Court. The petition is not prosecuted in the name of the State, nor is the proper party respondent, nor does the petition comply with Rule 2-35 as to certified copies of the pleadings and court records of the [699]*699trial court. See Lester v. Grant Circuit Court (1948), 226 Ind. 186, 78 N. E. 2d 785.
Petition denied.
Note. — Reported in 143 N. E. 2d 666.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hootman v. State, 143 N.E.2d 666, 237 Ind. 698, 1957 Ind. LEXIS 307 (Ind. 1957).
143 N.E.2d 666 (Hootman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. SMITH ET UX.
143 N.E.2d 666 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1957)