Hooten v. Hooten
40 S.W.2d 52, 120 Tex. 538
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The plaintiff in error presents the same questions we have determined ■adversely to her contentions in an opinion this day filed in Cause No. 5006, John Cunningham v. Rozelle Cunningham et al., 120 Texas, 491, 40 S. W. (2d) 46, In accordance with the conclusion in that opinion, the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals should be and is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hooten v. Hooten, 40 S.W.2d 52, 120 Tex. 538 (Tex. 1931).
40 S.W.2d 52 (Hooten v. Hooten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Interest of Miller
605 S.W.2d 332 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Brillhart v. Brillhart
176 S.W.2d 229 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1943)
Williams v. Guynes
97 S.W.2d 988 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Smith v. Givens
97 S.W.2d 532 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Bowyer v. Bowyer
80 S.W.2d 475 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1935)