Hooten v. Hooten
40 S.W.2d 52, 120 Tex. 538
This text of 40 S.W.2d 52 (Hooten v. Hooten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hooten v. Hooten, 40 S.W.2d 52, 120 Tex. 538 (Tex. 1931).
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The plaintiff in error presents the same questions we have determined ■adversely to her contentions in an opinion this day filed in Cause No. 5006, John Cunningham v. Rozelle Cunningham et al., 120 Texas, 491, 40 S. W. (2d) 46, In accordance with the conclusion in that opinion, the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals should be and is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In the Interest of Miller
605 S.W.2d 332 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Brillhart v. Brillhart
176 S.W.2d 229 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1943)
Williams v. Guynes
97 S.W.2d 988 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Smith v. Givens
97 S.W.2d 532 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Bowyer v. Bowyer
80 S.W.2d 475 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
40 S.W.2d 52, 120 Tex. 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooten-v-hooten-tex-1931.