Hooten v. Fed. Land Bk. of Columbia
132 So. 693, 101 Fla. 1048
Opinion
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the Decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said Decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said Decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hooten v. Fed. Land Bk. of Columbia, 132 So. 693, 101 Fla. 1048 (Fla. 1931).
132 So. 693 (Hooten v. Fed. Land Bk. of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
D.A.D., Inc. v. Poole
407 So. 2d 1072 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Cassel v. Gulf Life Insurance
143 So. 2d 510 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Munck v. Manatee River Bank & Trust Co.
165 So. 57 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)