Hooten v. Fed. Land Bk. of Columbia

132 So. 693, 101 Fla. 1048
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 3, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 132 So. 693 (Hooten v. Fed. Land Bk. of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hooten v. Fed. Land Bk. of Columbia, 132 So. 693, 101 Fla. 1048 (Fla. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the Decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said Decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said Decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Strum, C.J., and Whitfield and Buford, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

D.A.D., Inc. v. Poole
407 So. 2d 1072 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Cassel v. Gulf Life Insurance
143 So. 2d 510 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Munck v. Manatee River Bank & Trust Co.
165 So. 57 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 So. 693, 101 Fla. 1048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooten-v-fed-land-bk-of-columbia-fla-1931.