Hoot v. State

706 So. 2d 134, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2146, 1998 WL 88220
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 4, 1998
DocketNo. 96-3746
StatusPublished

This text of 706 So. 2d 134 (Hoot v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoot v. State, 706 So. 2d 134, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2146, 1998 WL 88220 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s adjudication and sentence but remand for the entry of a written order finding the appellant guilty of violating his probation.

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
706 So. 2d 134, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2146, 1998 WL 88220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoot-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.