Hoose v. Drumm
This text of 255 A.D. 417 (Hoose v. Drumm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Rhodes and Crapser, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., upon the ground that the injury was received on a portion of defendants’ lands across the highway from the school and playground. It was unfenced and in the state in which nature had left it. Plaintiff was not invited to go thereon more than upon lands owned by a private individual. The injury was received through the act of another pupil, against which defendants could not and did not attempt to guard; McNamee, J., dissents, with an opinion; Heffernan, J., dissents, with an opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
255 A.D. 417, 7 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoose-v-drumm-nyappdiv-1938.