Hoopes v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

235 P. 742, 71 Cal. App. 799, 1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 536
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedMarch 7, 1925
DocketDocket No. 4938.
StatusPublished

This text of 235 P. 742 (Hoopes v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoopes v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 235 P. 742, 71 Cal. App. 799, 1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 536 (Cal. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Petitioners herein were defendants in an action commenced in the justice's court of Los Angeles township by one Jay Smith.[1] Otherwise the record before us in this proceeding is the same in all respects as that presented in Hoopes v. SuperiorCourt, ante, p. 564 [235 P. 739.]

The questions involved herein have been discussed and decided in the opinion filed in case numbered 4939 (ante, p. 564).

The peremptory writ of mandate is therefore granted, and the Superior Court is directed to dismiss the appeal.

Finlayson, P.J., and Works, J., concurred.

*Page 800

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoopes v. Superior Court
235 P. 739 (California Court of Appeal, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 P. 742, 71 Cal. App. 799, 1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoopes-v-superior-court-of-los-angeles-county-calctapp-1925.