Hooper v. United Traction Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Hooper v. United Traction Co.

17 Pa. Super. 640, 1901 Pa. Super. LEXIS 376

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 25, 1901

DocketNo. 2; Appeal, No. 15

StatusPublished

This text of 17 Pa. Super. 640 (Hooper v. United Traction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hooper v. United Traction Co., 17 Pa. Super. 640, 1901 Pa. Super. LEXIS 376 (Pa. Ct. App. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Beaver, J.,

In the joint action by father and son against the defendant for damages, a verdict in favor of the father for |260 and of the son for $800 was rendered, upon which judgment was entered. Separate appeals were taken by the defendant, the first of which has been considered in an opinion this day filed.

For the reasons therein stated, which apply with equal force to the present case, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Beaver, J.,

In the joint action by father and son against the defendant for damages, a verdict in favor of the father for |260 and of the son for $800 was rendered, upon which judgment was entered. Separate appeals were taken by the defendant, the first of which has been considered in an opinion this day filed.

For the reasons therein stated, which apply with equal force to the present case, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Pa. Super. 640, 1901 Pa. Super. LEXIS 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooper-v-united-traction-co-pasuperct-1901.