Hooper v. State

820 S.W.2d 276, 307 Ark. 378, 1991 Ark. LEXIS 664
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedDecember 9, 1991
DocketCR 91-232
StatusPublished

This text of 820 S.W.2d 276 (Hooper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hooper v. State, 820 S.W.2d 276, 307 Ark. 378, 1991 Ark. LEXIS 664 (Ark. 1991).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Byron Hooper, by his attorney, George W. Mason, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to his negligence in meeting the ninety-day limit for filing the record in this court. See Ark. R. App. P. 5(a).

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
820 S.W.2d 276, 307 Ark. 378, 1991 Ark. LEXIS 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooper-v-state-ark-1991.