Hooper v. Smith

19 Ill. 53
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1857
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 19 Ill. 53 (Hooper v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hooper v. Smith, 19 Ill. 53 (Ill. 1857).

Opinion

Breese, J.

This suit was commenced by Smith against Hooper and Hay, before a justice of the peace of Washington county, on a note, and judgment rendered thereon against the defendants for the amount of the note and interest.

Hooper, eight days before the sitting of the Circuit Court of that county, took an appeal.

The appellee was not served with process, but on the second day of the term entered his appearance by attorney.

On the next day thereafter, when the cause was reached in its order for trial, the appellant was called and made default, whereupon the appeal was dismissed, a procedendo awarded, and judgment rendered against both defendants Hooper and Hay, for damages and costs.

A writ of error is sued out from this court, and the errors assigned question the correctness of these proceedings.

We are satisfied the proceedings are irregular, and the judgment must be reversed for the reasons, First, That the appellee in the court below, not having been served with process, and the appeal not having been taken ten days before the sitting of the court, was not in a position to force the appellant to trial.

As a general rule of practice, a party in court cannot force his adversary to act, until he himself is in a condition to be forced to proceed.

Second, The defendant Hay did not appeal, nor was he summoned, as he should have been. Sec. 64, ch. 59, R. S.

The suit could neither be tried nor dismissed at the first term, without a summons against him. He was not in court, to receive its judgment. c

The judgment is reversed and cause remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carelin v. Traeger
261 Ill. App. 1 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1931)
Waidner v. Pauly
30 N.E. 1025 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1892)
Norton v. Coggswell
35 Ill. App. 566 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1890)
Bessey v. Ruhland
33 Ill. App. 73 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1889)
Fergus v. Lohman
27 Ill. App. 448 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1888)
Lehman v. Freeman
86 Ill. 208 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1877)
Boyd v. Kocher
31 Ill. 295 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1863)
Smith v. Wilson
26 Ill. 186 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1861)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Ill. 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooper-v-smith-ill-1857.