Hooper v. Power

New York Court of Appeals

Hooper v. Power

186 N.E.2d 565, 12 N.Y.2d 764

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 1, 1962

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 186 N.E.2d 565 (Hooper v. Power) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hooper v. Power, 186 N.E.2d 565, 12 N.Y.2d 764 (N.Y. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs. We hold that the signatures in the group containing 184 signatures were valid (see Matter of Di Crocco v. Power, 12 N Y 2d 762, decided herewith) and that the signatures in the groups containing 220 and 156 signatures respectively were valid for the reasons stated in the majority opinion at the Appellate Division. No opinion. '

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Feoessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs. We hold that the signatures in the group containing 184 signatures were valid (see Matter of Di Crocco v. Power, 12 N Y 2d 762, decided herewith) and that the signatures in the groups containing 220 and 156 signatures respectively were valid for the reasons stated in the majority opinion at the Appellate Division. No opinion. '

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Feoessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 N.E.2d 565, 12 N.Y.2d 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooper-v-power-ny-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack