Hooper v. Power
186 N.E.2d 565, 12 N.Y.2d 764
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs. We hold that the signatures in the group containing 184 signatures were valid (see Matter of Di Crocco v. Power, 12 N Y 2d 762, decided herewith) and that the signatures in the groups containing 220 and 156 signatures respectively were valid for the reasons stated in the majority opinion at the Appellate Division. No opinion. '
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Feoessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hooper v. Power, 186 N.E.2d 565, 12 N.Y.2d 764 (N.Y. 1962).
186 N.E.2d 565 (Hooper v. Power) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caralyus v. Hayduk
72 A.D.2d 590 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Vlasaty v. Rhode Island State Board of Elections
376 A.2d 320 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1977)
Proskin v. May
355 N.E.2d 793 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Socialist Workers Party v. Rockefeller
314 F. Supp. 984 (S.D. New York, 1970)