Hooper v. North Carolina

Fourth Circuit

Hooper v. North Carolina

222 F. App'x 271

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 27, 2007·No. No. 06-2121·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Deona Renna Hooper appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hooper v. North Carolina, No. 1:04-cv-00014-NCT, 2006 WL 2850596 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Deona Renna Hooper appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hooper v. North Carolina, No. 1:04-cv-00014-NCT, 2006 WL 2850596 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hooper v. North Carolina, 222 F. App'x 271 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

222 F. App'x 271 (Hooper v. North Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.