Hooper v. Louisiana Pigment Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Hooper v. Louisiana Pigment Co.

218 So. 3d 627, 2017 La. LEXIS 818

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 13, 2017·No. NO. 2017-CC-0380·Published

Opinion

Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 2013-001665; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW16-00861

[628]*628h Granted in part. The judgment of the trial court granting the motion in limine is reversed insofar as it excludes evidence of the plaintiffs applications for disability benefits. See Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp., 526 U.S. 795 (1999);

Smith v. Thurman Oils, Inc., 06-0743 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/28/06), 951 So. 2d 359, writ denied, 07-0207 (La. 3/23/07), 951 So. 2d 1106. In all other respects, the writ is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 2013-001665; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW16-00861

[628]*628h Granted in part. The judgment of the trial court granting the motion in limine is reversed insofar as it excludes evidence of the plaintiffs applications for disability benefits. See Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp., 526 U.S. 795 (1999);

Smith v. Thurman Oils, Inc., 06-0743 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/28/06), 951 So. 2d 359, writ denied, 07-0207 (La. 3/23/07), 951 So. 2d 1106. In all other respects, the writ is denied.

Hooper v. Louisiana Pigment Co., 218 So. 3d 627, 2017 La. LEXIS 818 (La. 2017).

Pincite

218 So. 3d 627 (Hooper v. Louisiana Pigment Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related