Hooper v. Louisiana Pigment Co.
This text of 218 So. 3d 627 (Hooper v. Louisiana Pigment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 2013-001665; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW16-00861
[628]*628h Granted in part. The judgment of the trial court granting the motion in limine is reversed insofar as it excludes evidence of the plaintiffs applications for disability benefits. See Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp., 526 U.S. 795 (1999);
Smith v. Thurman Oils, Inc., 06-0743 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/28/06), 951 So. 2d 359, writ denied, 07-0207 (La. 3/23/07), 951 So. 2d 1106. In all other respects, the writ is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
218 So. 3d 627, 2017 La. LEXIS 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooper-v-louisiana-pigment-co-la-2017.