Hooper v. Kingsbury ex rel. State Land Office
248 U.S. 544, 39 S. Ct. 134, 63 L. Ed. 413, 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1659
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1)' Messenger v. Kingsbury, 158 California, 611; People v. California Fish Co., 166 California, 576; People v. Banning Co., 166 California, 635. (2) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137. (3) Campbell v. Wade, 132 U. S. 34; Gonzales v. French, 164 U. S. 338, 345; Banning Co. v. California, 240 U. S. 142, 154.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hooper v. Kingsbury ex rel. State Land Office, 248 U.S. 544, 39 S. Ct. 134, 63 L. Ed. 413, 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1659 (1919).
248 U.S. 544 (Hooper v. Kingsbury ex rel. State Land Office) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Campbell v. Wade
132 U.S. 34 (Supreme Court, 1889)
Gonzales v. French
164 U.S. 338 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown
187 U.S. 308 (Supreme Court, 1902)
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
228 U.S. 596 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Manhattan Life Ins. Co. of NY v. Cohen
234 U.S. 123 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Banning Co. v. California Ex Rel. Webb
240 U.S. 142 (Supreme Court, 1916)