Hooper v. J. H. & W. B. Bankhead

49 So. 858, 161 Ala. 523, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 167
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 24, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 49 So. 858 (Hooper v. J. H. & W. B. Bankhead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hooper v. J. H. & W. B. Bankhead, 49 So. 858, 161 Ala. 523, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 167 (Ala. 1909).

Opinion

ANDERSON, J.

The bill was filed under chapter 127 of the Code of 1907 to quiet the title to land therein described, and compiled with section 5444 as to the averment of ownership and possession by the complainants.

It is insisted by the appellant that the failure of the bill to set out the source of complainant’s title rendered it subject to this ground of the demurrer interposed by him. The (statute neither requires nor contemplates that the source of the complainant’s claim or title should be set out in the bill of complaint. — Kendrick v. Colyar, 143 Ala. 597, 42 South. 110. The case of Berry v. T. & C. Co., 134 Ala. 622, 33 South. 8, has no bearing on this question.

The decree of the county court, overruling the respondent’s demurrer, is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Dowdell, C. J., and McClellan and Sayre, J J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dalrymple v. White
402 So. 2d 968 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1981)
Campbell v. Rice
12 So. 2d 385 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1943)
Davis v. Daniels
85 So. 797 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 So. 858, 161 Ala. 523, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooper-v-j-h-w-b-bankhead-ala-1909.